Telcos seek role in mass of OTT experiments
Telcordia exec predicts train wreck as telcos look to replace linear programming with monetizable online TV
Change in the over-the-top (OTT) world is accelerating at a rapid pace, forcing communication service providers (CSPs) to figure out how they will play in a market that will certainly look drastically different within a few years time. Right now, most online television and video implementations are experimental, but if CSPs aren’t careful, a train wreck could be inevitable, according to Grant Lenahan, Vice President, Strategy, Chief Strategy Office of back-office specialist Telcordia.
Consumers want to move from linear to non-linear programming, but Lenahan said they do not want to pay twice for the same content, an opinion shared by many (but not all) in the industry. When forced to choose, he anticipates that consumers will opt for online content in lieu of a standard cable package – but that’s not necessarily bad news for the CSP.
“We are encouraging our customers, CSPs, to look carefully at providing a service,” Lenahan said. “If they are going to provide a non-linear alternative to cable, it has to be a good enough alternative to cable that you can give up your cable subscription. If not, all you are doing is paying again. That’s a limited market. If you put together a good enough alternative that the consumer doesn’t need cable, just this set, that’s a whole different situation.”
There is where CSPs will have to navigate carefully to avoid crashing. While it might be intimidating to CSPS that have embraced – and profited from – the cable TV model, Lenahan suggested that rather than fear video cord-cutting, they embrace it. By reliving their customers of a $50 to $60 monthly fee, they can instead look for revenues from a pay-per-use model, much like Apple’s iTunes.
For the service provider, Lenahan said this style of content over broadband service could look one of two ways: a telco 2.0 model in which CSPs incorporate a set of value-added services to existing online content through open APIs or an aggregator/proxy model in which the telco acts as the hub for all content on the Web, including sites such as Amazon, Netflix and iPlayer. While the aggregator model provides more revenue, it is also a more drastic step and one that the content providers might not let the CSPs make just yet. The content providers are reluctant to give up their branding, likely resulting in a tug-of-war between the value-added features consumers want and the balkanization of content.
“[Content providers] are foolish not to, but it’s still not clear they will allow them to,” Lenahan said, adding that politically, the telco 2.0 path is more likely. In the role of content aggregator, subscribers would have a single log-in to access the service provider portal, which would house content from across the Web. No credit card would be required, and consumers could set parameters such as the kind or amount of content consumed. These value-added functions could include charging and promotions, user policies and controls, bandwidth and quality of service guarantees, ad control and privacy-protected user profiles and APIs for the operator functions of cataloging, assurance and fulfillment.
Lenahan’s message to CSPs was to start thinking now about ways to help the content industry. The worst case scenario would be content providers feeling forced to build their own technology because CSPs didn’t give them the right solution at the right time with the right business model, he said. The ability to send content to any device is a network capability and the domain of CSPs. Regardless of the merits of sites like Hulu or the criticisms of OTT ventures like the cable industry’s TV Everywhere, CSPs need an OTT play that would allow them to compete in new markets and maintain their revenue streams. The opportunity, and perhaps the need, to do it – and do it right – is too significant for them to ignore.
“That is why I think the important message is there are things telecom can do for you, probably better and more uniformly than you can do it yourself,” Lenahan said. “It will make you more profitable. I don’t think [content providers] see that and understand it today. We need to communicate it effectively, but not dictate to them how their business will run.”
Want to use this article? Click here for options!
© 2013 Penton Media Inc.
In this Webinar you will learn how to create a real-time relationship with your customers, how to proactively improve the customer experience, and how to successfully target and cross-sell services to boost incremental revenue.
- Megabytes to Megabucks, Bandwidth to Business Models: How 4G Is Changing Everything
- How to Unplug Your Redundant Telco Apps To Save Money and Improve Efficiency
- When IaaS Isn't Enough: Service Provider Business Models to Drive Growth and Build Margin
- How to Transform Your Aging Telco Voice Network to Drive New Profits and Revenue
- Creative Licensing Approaches for Telcos & Their Network Equipment Vendors
- Smart Home Opportunity: Balancing Customer Data & Privacy
This paper discusses the rise of Diameter and benefits of Diameter Protocol.
- Conducting The Orchestration – Order Management at the Speed of Business
- Toward a Converged Network Edge
- Beyond Spam – Email Security in the Age of Blended Threats
- 6 Important Steps to Evaluating a Web Filtering Solution
- The Expertise to Protect You from Botnet and DDoS Attacks
- Seeing is Believing – Bridging the Order Visibility Gap
Service providers are under tremendous pressure to turn up new services faster then before and, at the same time,
to do it at less expense - and intra-office fiber is one of the biggest challenges in terms of both cost and service
From the Blog
Join the Discussion
Get more out of Connected Planet by visiting our related resources below:
Connected Planet highlights the next generation of service providers, as well as how their customers use services in new ways.Subscribe Now