Solutions to help your business Sign up for our newsletters Join our Community
  • Share

AT&T sued for involvement in closed spectrum auction

AT&T and AT&T Wireless are being sued for setting up a front company that enabled the communications giant to bid on and win licenses in the C & F block PCS spectrum auction supposedly reserved for small or minority-owned businesses.

More on this Topic

Industry News

Blogs

Briefing Room

The suit is brought by New York state-based TPS Utilicom, a participant in the auction that was conducted in December 2000 and January 2001. TPS claims that AT&T “through various affiliates and subsidiaries launched a front company, which it christened ‘Alaska Native Wireless LLC,’ to enable it to bid successfully on licenses reserved for small and minority-owned businesses and acquire bidding credits intended only for those businesses.”

A spokesman for AT&T Wireless denied the allegations.

“Alaska Native Wireless is an independent entity fully and properly qualified under FCC designated entity requirements. ATT Wireless is confident the lawsuit filed by TPS Utilicom is completely without merit,” he said.

According to the lawsuit, with only $1000 in assets and no gross revenue during the previous two years, Alaska Native registered for the auction as a “very small business.” But the company, bid $2.6 billion to win 26 licenses in the closed auction and another $300 million for an additional 18 licenses in the open auction. Of the $2.9 billion in total bids from Alaska Native, $2.6 million was provided by AT&T.

Though the relationship between AT&T and Alaska Native was known at the time of the auction, TPS claims AT&T did not properly disclose its ownership interest in the company and unjustly enriched itself while increasing costs for the closed auction’s other participants.

The lawsuit, filed in California’s Superior Court for Los Angeles County, seeks nearly $1.06 billion in restitution, punitive damages and disgorgement.

However, the court is not being asked to strip Alaska Native of its licenses--that request has been filed with the FCC, according to Brian Brooks, an attorney with O’Melveny & Myers, the law firm representing TPS. Monetary damages are the domain of the court system, he said.

“Because Alaska Native participated, [TPS] paid way too much for those licenses,” Brooks said. The lawsuit, then, seeks “money damages that would make us whole.”

Want to use this article? Click here for options!
© 2012 Penton Media Inc.

Learning Library

Featured Content

A time and money saving approach to fiber deployment

Service providers are under tremendous pressure to turn up new services faster then before and, at the same time, to do it at less expense - and intra-office fiber is one of the biggest challenges in terms of both cost and service turn-up.

The Latest

News

From the Blog

Briefingroom

Join the Discussion

Resources

Get more out of Connected Planet by visiting our related resources below:

Connected Planet highlights the next generation of service providers, as well as how their customers use services in new ways.

Subscribe Now

Back to Top