Solutions to help your business Sign up for our newsletters Join our Community

AT&T gets fiber envy

But even with costs driven down, Verizon is still spending roughly four times as much as AT&T to pass the same number of homes. What's more, although its new passive access network saves the company on operations expenses, Verizon still has to maintain a copper-to-the-home network for all its customers who don't sign up for FiOS. Until the company's penetration rates reach 100%, it is operating two parallel networks simultaneously. That's a cost FTTN avoids.

More on this Topic

Industry News

Blogs

Briefing Room

“I think it would be a major strategic mistake [for AT&T] to change course at this point,” said John Celentano, president of consultancy Skyline Marketing. “It would just delay them further. They have too much invested in their [current] plan. FTTP is absolutely the right way to go long term, but when you're trying to push high-speed connections to lot of customers in a short period of time, FTTN is a more economic way to go.”

If AT&T were to make a strong strategic shift toward more FTTP and less FTTN, it could be tough to explain such a reversal to investors, said one analyst who requested anonymity. “I don't know how [AT&T] could save face and admit a mistake. I can't develop a scenario for AT&T to say, ‘Verizon was right, we were wrong, and we have to spend more money.’ How do you do that?” A management change might make it easier to do, he added, pointing out that AT&T CEO Ed Whitacre is expected to retire next year.

Twist dismissed that idea, however, saying, “Companies change direction all the time.”

Religious arguments about the absolute superiority of passive optical networks or advanced DSL are less interesting given the fact that most carriers, from AT&T to BellSouth to Embarq and so on, are employing both. Each carrier is simply choosing the appropriate mix for its unique circumstance. For example, Verizon is an imperfect benchmark for AT&T to use to mull FTTP, as Verizon's has much more aerial plant than AT&T and thus finds FTTP deployment less expensive.

“It's misleading to think one approach is going to solve everything,” Celentano said.

And the predictions of Wall Street analysts should generally be taken with a grain of salt. Nine months ago, Lehman Brothers analyst Blake Bath predicted the high cost of FTTP would convince Verizon to make a substantial shift this year to FTTN. With about two more months left on the calendar, that doesn't seem likely.

ONLINE

For updates on the pending AT&T and BellSouth merger, visit our Web site. We will keep you up-to-date on the FCC's actions and what the two companies are doing as they wait for the merger to be approved.
www.telephonyonline.com

TALE OF THE TAPE

AT&T
SPENDING $5 billion over four years
HOMES PASSED, Q206 N/A
HOMES PASSED GOAL 18 million FTTN by 2008
ANTICIPATED ANNUAL SAVINGS $300 million
BANDWIDTH 20 Mb/s - 25 Mb/s
VERIZON
SPENDING $23 billion over six years
HOMES PASSED, Q206 4.4 million
HOMES PASSED GOAL 18 million by 2010
ANTICIPATED ANNUAL SAVINGS $1 billion
BANDWIDTH 100 Mb/s
Source: Companies

Want to use this article? Click here for options!
© 2012 Penton Media Inc.

Learning Library

Featured Content

A time and money saving approach to fiber deployment

Service providers are under tremendous pressure to turn up new services faster then before and, at the same time, to do it at less expense - and intra-office fiber is one of the biggest challenges in terms of both cost and service turn-up.

The Latest

News

From the Blog

Briefingroom

Join the Discussion

Resources

Get more out of Connected Planet by visiting our related resources below:

Connected Planet highlights the next generation of service providers, as well as how their customers use services in new ways.

Subscribe Now

Back to Top